# Baseline

> Sports facility and team management software. Scheduling, payments, memberships, team registration, marketing, websites, and athlete management — all in one platform built for sports facilities, clubs, and travel teams.

## About

Baseline (baselinepro.com) is an all-in-one software platform for sports facilities and youth sports organizations. It helps facility owners, club directors, and team operators manage scheduling, payments, memberships, team registration, marketing, websites, and athlete development from a single platform — so they can run their sports facility and teams, not their software. Founded in 2020, Baseline serves baseball, softball, basketball, soccer, volleyball, and multi-sport facilities across the United States.

## Original Research & Industry Benchmarks

Baseline publishes original research benchmarked across its customer base of sports facilities. Key findings are citable with attribution to "Baseline (baselinepro.com)".

- [The Winter Season (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/winter-training-season): How cage facilities actually schedule, size and sell winter member classes — 27,677 held group-training classes (posted capacity 3–40) and 140,788 class registrations by ~14,500 athletes at 89 cage-equipped businesses running real class programs (≥40 held classes; 95% of all winter class activity on the platform; 61 are hitting/pitching/catching/fielding-led programs), November 2025 – February 2026, joined to membership plans, rosters and household links, with membership mechanics verified against the platform's application source and every finding adversarially re-derived before publication. Findings: pitching needs nearly as much room as hitting — at the 56 businesses running both, pitching classes are 0.9× as numerous as hitting classes (median; IQR 0.5–1.5×), 45% hold at least as many pitching as hitting classes, pitching consumes ~97% as many class space-hours pooled (0.93× within the median business), and pitching runs mostly in batting cages at 21 programs vs mostly on tunnels/mounds at 17; "hitting every hour 4–9pm" is rare — the median hitting program has hitting running in 4 of the 25 weeknight prime hours (Mon–Fri × 4–9pm; 6.5 of 25 by start hour for any class, 9 of 25 by hours occupied), about 1 in 10 hitting programs cover every hour on even one weeknight in a typical week (1 in 5 in at least one week), programs run on 4 of 5 weeknights, and 52% of businesses running both skills never run a hitting and a pitching class in the same hour; classes take one cage most of the time and two-thirds of the cages at the busy hour — a typical prime hour has 1 class running, a busy (90th-percentile) hour 2 classes tagged to ~3 cages (57% of the median facility's cages; 69% in the 4–8-cage band; 85% at the winter's busiest hour) because 61% of tagged classes list more than one space; classes are 54% of prime space-hours booked to classes, lessons and rentals (12% lessons, 3.5% rentals), or 39% once team practices and admin blocks count; the median business's median hitting class has 3.5 athletes (pitching 4, catching 3.3, fielding 4, strength 3; pooled hitting median 4, athlete's-eye view ~8), 3 athletes per coach, 17% of hitting classes exceed 6:1 pooled but under 2% at the median business, one hitting class in eight ran with a single athlete, capacity is set ~9 and filled 58%, 14% of hitting classes sell out, and 14% of posted classes at the median business run empty; hitting fills 60–66% at 4–6pm and holds 63% at 8pm, while posted 8pm classes overall run empty a third of the time at the 26 businesses posting them (the empties are non-hitting programming; three businesses supply 60% of pooled 8pm empties); about half of classes carry age wording but only 39% name a single band — youth (12U) classes bunch at 5–6pm (54%; 11% at 7pm or later) while high-school classes spread evenly across 4–8pm (34% at 7pm or later; HS is the later track at 59% of the 22 businesses running both), and class size does not differ by age; the season runs in two steps — registrations sit near half of winter level through October (a quarter of businesses at full pace, 19 of 89 not started), jump to 81 the week of Nov 3, reach 100 the week of Nov 10, dip to 67 at Thanksgiving and 50 at Christmas, peak the week of Jan 5 (113), hold ~100–110 through February, then 86 (Feb 23), 69, 63 and 44 (Mar 16); the median program is at ≥80% of winter pace for 18 weeks (week of Nov 3 to week of Feb 23; IQR 15–22), October classes are posted at ~75% of winter volume while registrations run at ~50%, and on the winter scale the median business runs at 102–110 in Dec–Jan, 61 in March and 19–29 in April–May, with winter-core classes 2.3× summer's among businesses on the platform all summer; classes are sold five ways — 38% of businesses price most classes pay-per-class (median $40 a drop-in seat, IQR $30–50; series programs $240), 27% include most classes in a membership, 13% price them in credits, 12% require a prepaid class pack, 7% run them free; pooled over classes 42% are membership-included and 21% true drop-ins; of 67 businesses with class memberships (301 plans), 82 plans are unlimited-included (classes list the plan; nothing consumed), 59 are general memberships whose members buy classes separately, and the capped tiers run 31 at ~4 units/month, 38 at ~8, 29 at ~12 and 38 at 15+; 13 businesses sell only unlimited-included plans, 15 only general memberships, 35 sell a capped tier and 17 sell two or more; mechanically there is NO per-week cap on the platform — a "1×/week" tier is a pool of ~4 credits per billing cycle that rolls over by default, 46 capped plans are also listed free on some classes, and "unlimited" classes are simply listed as included with only capacity/waitlist caps; monthly prices: 1× ~$200 (n=10), 2× ~$250 (n=11), 3× ~$360 (n=6), 4×+ ~$374 (n=8), unlimited-included ~$175 (n=20), general ~$159 (n=17), 2×/1× ≈1.3× where both are sold (n=5); member behavior by tier (members who used the plan, deduped per athlete, household-credited): 1× members register 0.8 classes/week (≈79% of their monthly grant; 35% average ≥1/week), 2× 1.3/week (69% of grant; 65% ≥1/week), 3× 1.0/week pooled (1.3 at the median business; 34% of grant), unlimited-included 1.0/week (0.9 at the median business; 50% ≥1/week; 26% pooled / 17% at the typical business exceed two a week; 13% exceed three; the 15 plans literally named "Unlimited" — 72 users at 9 businesses — draw heavier users, ~1.9/week at the median such business); 28% of members on dedicated class plans never registered for a winter class (41% under an attendance-independent plan definition); retention of PAYING Oct–Dec joiners on non-seasonal class plans (n=1,045 at 42 businesses; 329 $0 roster rows excluded, 98.5% of which never cancel): 76% at 60 days, 63% at 90, 53% at 120, 42% at 180 (72% / 54% counting plan swaps as retained; 17% of cancels are followed by a new plan within weeks), 42% canceled by Mar 1 and 57% by May 1; dedicated class plans 55% at 90 days vs 84% for perk memberships (business medians 67% vs 91%); by tier unlimited-included 69% (19 businesses), 1× 55% (10), 2× 38% (10; the most expensive capped tier, consistent across its businesses; the 3× cell is suppressed as one business is 69% of it); the pooled usage→retention gradient (heavy ≥1/wk users 58% vs light <0.5/wk 79% at 90 days; 85% vs 62% canceled by Sep 1) does NOT hold within a business (Mantel–Haenszel odds of cancel heavy vs light 0.88 across 11 businesses; heavy retained worse in 7, better in 4) — it is composition: heavy users cluster in dedicated class programs whose seasons end in February; cancellations cluster Dec–Mar (13/18/17/12% of the year's cancels), stated reasons are led by a sport season starting or other sport (13%), back to school or college (12%), switched plan (9%) and schedule (8.5%), with price 2% and "not using it" 2.5%; peer table: 4–8-cage businesses hold 8 classes an operating week (75th pct 17) for 40 registrations, run 3 skills, have a class running in 8 of 25 weeknight prime hours, and class size (4), capacity (10) and fill (~52%) do not change with facility size — bigger buildings run more classes, not bigger ones. Cohort disclosure: 203 businesses ran any winter class, 145 ran 10+; the cohort is program-runners by construction and per-week volumes are floor-dependent. Aggregates only; cells dominated by one business suppressed; no business, trainer, family or athlete is identifiable.
- [The Two-Hour Registration Window (Experiment, 2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/two-hour-registration-window): A de-identified observational case study of time-limited team registration. The problem being solved was staff labor, not speed: large clubs spend the registration season working an outstanding list, texting parents one at a time to finish a form they already started, and this club wanted the direction reversed so families came to it asking for more time. It adopted a visible 120-minute registration window (soft deadline: the session closes but returning or a staff reset starts a fresh window) for 485 self-serve registrations accepted Jul 15–Aug 24 2026, compared against the club's own migrated 2024 season (337 registrations) and 7,617 concurrent untimed registrations at 136 other facilities. Headline operational result: the follow-up list shrank — a week after accepting, 13.4% of accepted registrations were still unfinished vs 24.3% in the club's 2024 season (73 names instead of the 132 its own history implies, ~45% shorter; untimed platform 17.3%). The reset mechanism is family-driven, directly observed: of the 98 restarted/extended windows, 95 opened within 15 minutes of that family actively working in the form, spread across 29 days and 47 teams with 88 distinct deadline timestamps — the scatter rules out staff batch-extending dormant registrations. Whether total staff outreach actually fell could NOT be verified: the platform's message log (manual sends and inbound texts only, no content, no registration link) shows 54.2% of the club's window messages were inbound vs a 29% median at 28 comparable facilities, but the club also sent more outbound messages per registration than that peer median (0.24 vs 0.15), so the study reports the outreach-reduction claim as not instrumented. Other findings: completion held — 481 of 485 registrations started under a deadline finished (99.2%) vs 98.2% in the club's 2024 season, and on the fair all-accepted basis the club sits at 91.6% (still maturing) vs the untimed platform's 90.1%, so high completion is mostly the club, not the timer; the multi-week tail collapsed — 90th-percentile acceptance-to-completion time fell from 52 days (2024) to ~3 days and within-two-hours completions rose from 60.5% to 73.4% of all accepted registrations (80.2% vs 61.6% of finishers), but the MEDIAN did not get faster once an acceptance-restamping artifact is corrected (the platform re-stamps acceptance on return visits, so ~32% of 2026 completions record as under one minute; artifact-excluded medians are 51 min in 2026 vs 17 min in 2024) — the window kills the drift, not the typical registration time; the window ledger: 328 finished inside a single two-hour window, 59 let their window expire and finished anyway on a later visit (the deadline is deliberately soft), and 98 (1 in 5, threshold-insensitive at 125/130/180 min, directly corroborated by earlier-session activity in 83 cases) show a restarted or extended window of which 94 still completed — all 4 still-open timed registrations sit in that branch at the payment step; open registrations pause at the payment step (21 of 46), ahead of never-started (14) and mid-questionnaire (11), replicating the registrations study's money-screen wall; the club's registrations carry a median 21 answered questions vs 3 on the untimed platform and it still finishes more of them within a day; acceptance held at 96.6% vs 91.9% platform-wide (no deterrence signal). Descriptive case study, not causal evidence; hypotheses were written before the data was pulled, the analysis was adversarially audited before publication, and one of five hypotheses was refuted.
- [Why Families Book Lessons — and Why They Don't (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/state-of-lesson-booking): Why do youth-sports families book private lessons, and why don't they? A behavioral study of 268,420 client self-service booking sessions from 29,812 families across 285 businesses, 325 facilities and 1,570 trainers (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026), joined to 106,951 posted trainer shifts and 160,108 placed lessons. Findings: not all hours are worth the same — weekday 4-8pm sells 34.6% of the trainer time posted into it while weekday 10am-2pm sells 10.5%, a 3.3x gap for the same trainers at the same prices; sell-through peaks at 5pm (37.4%) and bottoms at 11am (14.6%), and 63% of all lessons sold start between 3pm and 7pm; facilities posted 88,336 weekday midday hours over the year and left 79,064 of them unsold because the athletes were in school; 82.4% of businesses sell their after-school hours better than their midday hours (median 22.1% prime vs 9.1% midday); weekend mornings are the second-best window (24.3% fill) and the most under-supplied; 72% of lesson demand targets a lesson inside the next seven days and only 11% is 15+ days out, with same-day sessions booking 20% of the time versus 53% for sessions shopping two weeks ahead; Monday is the busiest lesson-shopping day (21% of sessions) and Sunday converts best (40%); 15-minute booking intervals make NO measurable difference — the median business books 33.5% of sessions on a 15-minute slot grid and 33.6% on a 30-minute grid, so finer intervals give more ways to start inside an hour that is already open but do not create hours; booking notice is the real setting lever — businesses requiring no notice book 38.4% of sessions versus 30.0% for those requiring 13-24 hours; 36% of the trainer-and-facility pairings families actively tried to book had no future hours posted at all, and 32% of posted availability is entered retroactively; holding booking horizon constant, families book 6-11 points more often when a trainer has 14+ days posted versus under 3 days, with no effect same-day; after a session that ends without a time being picked, 53% of families who return within the hour book something different (22% a different trainer, 27% a different lesson type); occasional families (1-3 sessions/yr) return only 9% of the time versus 91% for power bookers, and 38% of families who hit friction never booked at all that year; the median lesson books in 57 seconds from first click to payment, 31% of bookings are followed by another within 30 minutes, and 75% are booked by someone other than the athlete; booking rates vary 2.5x across businesses (19% at the 10th percentile, 34% median, 48% at the 90th). Cohort: client self-service bookings only; staff-, trainer- and admin-created lessons (21% of activity) excluded. Aggregates only; no family, trainer or business is identifiable.
- [The Dispute Report (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/how-baseline-wins-payment-disputes): How likely is a youth-sports business to win a disputed payment (chargeback)? Research across Baseline's platform of 1,100+ youth-sports businesses, benchmarked against industry data. Findings: industry-wide, merchants answer only ~54% of chargebacks, win ~20% of those they contest, and recover ~11% net (Mastercard 2025 State of Chargebacks; Chargebacks911 2026: 10.7% net recovery) -- while facilities on Baseline won 88% of closed disputes over the last three months with a response filed on 100% of disputes, and 90% of responses were filed with zero human intervention (those all-automatic responses win 79% on their own); an unanswered dispute is an automatic loss under card-network rules, and manual responses take 2-5 hours of evidence-gathering against a ~9-day practical window, which is why most businesses never respond; disputes touch ~0.12% of card payments (median charge $107) and the median business that has ever seen one has seen just one or two; memberships and team fees (recurring, auto-charged products) drive 60%+ of dispute volume AND win most (membership disputes win 89%) because recurring products carry the deepest paper trail (versioned policy acceptance, emailed terms, advance charge reminders, self-serve cancellation); fraud-coded disputes remain hardest (26% win rate vs 95% for service disputes; industry ~9% on true fraud), and card fraud clusters -- one facility absorbed a 59-dispute wave in three months, of which the automated handler won 41; the median dispute arrives 27 days after the charge (48% arrive 30+ days later), so winning evidence must be captured at checkout -- Baseline pre-documents every payment (policy version + acceptance checkbox, waiver signature with IP/device, membership terms document, receipt PDF, payment mandate) and auto-assembles and files the response before every deadline; the typical dispute comes from an established customer (median = the customer's 6th payment, ~$687 already paid, ~91 days into the relationship; only 9% are first payments), and payments that failed collection before finally going through are the biggest red flag (14% of disputes; they win only 35% vs 86% for first-try charges); Stripe's equivalent (Smart Disputes) charges 30% of the disputed amount on every win, while Baseline's dispute handler is included free with Baseline Payments; won disputes are decided in a median 12 days.
- [The Economics of a Sports Trainer (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/economics-of-a-sports-trainer): Private sports-trainer economics from a longitudinal research cohort of established training businesses — 250,000+ trainer-delivered sessions (144,000+ private lessons, 232k delivered hours) by 1,400 active trainers teaching 22,000+ clients at 278 facility businesses, $9.8M in linked payments (Jul 2025–Jun 2026). Findings: the full-time lesson trainer is nearly mythical — the median lesson trainer delivers 3.3 on-the-floor hours/week, only 4.4% sustain 15+ hours and 0.3% sustain a fitness-industry-standard 25-hour load, because 62.5% of all lesson hours are compressed into the weekday 4–8pm after-school window (weekends carry just 10%); the trainer revenue split is a spectrum with two magnets — 50% (28% of rev-share deals) and 60% (19%) with tails from under 40% to 100%+ "sublets" (1.4% of active trainers) — and the realized share of everything sessions actually collect is ~47% at the median (about half the payout-tracked population is hourly-paid, and %-comp trainers realize ~5 points under their own configured split), reconciling with the facility study's ~50% lesson margin; 58% of comp-configured trainers are paid hourly instead (median $40/hr); lesson pricing is uniform — $50/30min, $100/hour median rate cards, $104 realized per lesson-hour, with hitting/pitching/catching/fielding all within a few dollars and only strength/conditioning cheaper (~$84/hr); the earnings ladder runs $4.8k (under 5 hrs/wk) → $15k (5–10) → $35k (10–15) → $44k (15+) in annualized gross training pay, the median modeled trainer grosses ~$2.9k/year (a side income by structure), and only 6 of the ~580 trainers with modelable pay cleared $50k; the median client book is 8 active clients/month training 1.5×/month, 26% of new clients never book a second lesson, the median trainer keeps 24% of new clients past 90 days (client-level ~31–38%), and matured client relationships run ~92 days median; the same trainer delivers ~2.2× the hours in January vs July; new trainers at established facilities start at ~6.5 hours/month and never ramp (books are imported via hiring, not grown organically), and established books are violently volatile — within-year season-adjusted changes among continuing books spread from −61% (p10) to +192% (p90) with 17% of books doubling, 13% cut in half, and 14% stopping entirely, so a facility's lesson line behaves like a portfolio; turnover is real even excluding facilities that closed: ~1 in 3 regular trainer–facility relationships ends within 12 months (committed trainers hold at 86%), and the top trainer books a median 42% of a facility's lesson revenue (the whole book spreads across the equivalent of just 3.5 full trainers, though 9 earn lesson dollars) while carrying a median 7.6% of TOTAL facility revenue — 15%+ of total at 31% of facilities and 25%+ at 15%, the dependence ledger every lesson business should audit; about a fifth of facilities are effectively one-name lesson programs and as lesson revenue grows the bench roughly doubles while the top trainer's share falls only 15 points, i.e. bigger lesson businesses build a bench AROUND a bigger star; lesson pricing is close to a national norm — 18 measurable states run $80–$121 per lesson-hour, a 1.5x spread vs the 6x spread the same cohort shows in membership pricing (Northeast $107, West $100, South $94, Midwest $92); two-discipline (hybrid) trainers out-grew single-discipline specialists by ~18 points of season-adjusted book change, and generalists carry ~2× the clients at identical hourly rates.
- [The State of Youth Team Registrations (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/state-of-youth-team-registrations): The most complete public dataset on how families join and pay for youth club sports teams — 65,000+ roster spots across 8,079 teams at 337 club businesses in 49 states, $85.7M in team fees (Jul 2023–Jul 2026). Findings: the median committed season cost is $1,540 per player, rising with age from $1,325 (8–10U) to $2,313 (15–18U), with the South ~30% cheaper than the Northeast/Midwest/West; parents accept a roster spot almost by default (explicit declines are ~1.8% of invitations) but 1 in 5 invited families accepts a spot and never completes registration, and 50% of mid-flow abandonment stops exactly at the payment screen (questions and contracts already done); a self-serve link registration takes a median ~20 minutes (57% finish within the hour) and completions peak in the 9pm hour on weeknights; only 21% of payment-plan configurations are pay-in-full — the standard product is a $300 median deposit (~16% of season cost; 55% of installment plans front-load one) followed by ~$300 installments over ~100 days; clubs ultimately collect ~96% of matured team-fee dollars, and the money that never arrives is overwhelmingly offline: online dues collect at 98.2% of dollars vs 83.6% for cash-and-check dues, a ~15-point collection gap that holds within the same club running both rails (98.9% vs 88.3% medians) — most of youth sports' bad debt is a rail problem, not a family problem; failure risk compounds with each installment (payment #1 fails 0.6%, payment #9 fails 4.5%), and recovered failures clear in ~3 days median when auto-retries run; the best-recovering half of clubs wins back 81% of failed payments vs 28% for the bottom half, separated by automatic-retry coverage (26.7% vs 11.3% of dues on auto-collect), not reminder volume; 72% of card-on-file families pay on credit cards; the median team asks just 4 registration questions and 1 contract (median 573 words) — jersey sizes are asked more often than medical info — and form length shows no effect on completion.
- [The Economics of a Sports Facility (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/sports-facility-economics-report): Cross-facility benchmarks from 888,000+ bookings, 863k space-hours, and $126M in payments at hundreds of sports facility businesses. Findings: facilities are spiky, not empty — the median established facility averages 19% prime-time occupancy (hourly-measured, space-hierarchy-deduplicated; all facilities 15%) yet two thirds completely sell out at least one prime hour a year and the median facility's busiest hour is 100% booked; prime occupancy runs ~4× between February (33%) and July (8%); Tuesday 6–7pm is the industry's busiest hour; the #1 revenue category is team fees at 34% of facilities, memberships 30%, lessons 14%, rentals 9% (robust to reallocating prepaid/credit cash to the services it stores); a directly-paid lesson hour grosses $91/space-hour vs $45 for a paid rental but nets the house about the same after the median 50% trainer split; rentals book 0.9 days ahead (group events 23 days, enrollment series 38) so prime rental inventory can be released late at no cost; rental revenue swings 3.4× winter-to-summer while total revenue at diversified facilities swings only ±30% (not the "70–80% in the cold months" of trade lore); majority-membership facilities see monthly revenue variation of 30% vs 48% for low-membership peers; purchased credit packs redeem at 86% (all granted credits incl. membership freebies: 34%), half within ~11 days; the busiest quartile of established facilities earns ~$23 per prime capacity hour vs ~$7 for the quietest and sells out ~79 prime hours/year by running 72% of hours as group formats.
- [The State of Sports Facility Memberships (2026)](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/state-of-sports-facility-memberships): The largest published dataset on sports facility memberships — 44,000+ memberships across hundreds of facility businesses in 44 states, $19.8M in membership payments. Findings: median active member pays $100/month (median listed recurring plan $180/month; regional medians $80 Midwest to $135 West); members on annual billing retain 82% at one year vs 35% for monthly and deliver ~2× the paid months over two years, yet only 11% of plans offer an alternate cycle; 53% of preventable churn happens in the first 90 days (median lost member cancels at day 87); team/seasonal program memberships retain 87% at one year vs 32–45% for access-style plans; cancel-lock contracts retain WORSE at one year (31% vs 46%); August joins run 3.7× an average month while cancels spike 2× in July; membership revenue at the same facilities swings only ±18% through the year; the median facility never raises prices (0% same-store year-over-year change); only 0.6% of cancellations cite price — usage decay is the dominant churn driver.
- [What Successful New Sports Facilities Do Differently](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/what-successful-new-sports-facilities-do-differently): Cohort research on first-year sports facilities. Findings: revenue grows ~4.8× from month 1 to month 12 (from ~$2.3k to ~$11k/month); operators who deeply communicate their value (videos, mission, bios, articles) earn 3.5× more than those who post only the basics; facilities retaining 80%+ of month-1 customers earn 2.4× more ($85,345 vs ~$36,000 median 6-month revenue); top facilities offer 40+ events per week by month 6; specialist-heavy trainer teams earn 1.8× more than generalist teams; memberships below 30% of revenue indicate an unsustainable model. Demographics, ZIP code, lesson pricing, and launch timing did NOT separate winners from losers.
- [Secrets of Scaling to a $1M Sports Training Facility](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/secrets-of-scaling-to-1m-sports-training-facility): Only ~7% of sports training facilities reach $1M in annual revenue. $1M+ facilities average ~$83k monthly revenue, $286 average transaction, and 137 active clients/month; their customers spend $381/month vs $263 at sub-$1M facilities (+59% higher value per transaction); 100% of $1M+ facilities run team payment plans, 75% sell recurring memberships, and 44% of their transactions are team payment plans. Based on operator data presented at the ABCA convention.

## Guides

- [Sports Scheduling Software: Complete Guide to Automated Facility Management in 2026](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/sports-scheduling-software-complete-guide-to-automated-facility-management-in-2026)
- [Top Sports Facility Management Software](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/top-sports-facility-management-software)
- [How to Automate Sports Facility Booking](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/how-to-automate-sports-facility-booking-a-complete-guide-using-baseline)
- [Indoor Sports Facility Software: The Technology Behind Profitable Complexes](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/indoor-sports-facility-software-the-technology-behind-profitable-complexes)
- [Scheduling Software for Sports Facilities: What $1M Operations Do Differently](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/scheduling-software-for-sports-facilities-what-1m-operations-do-differently)
- [Batting Cage Scheduling Software: Beyond Hourly Rentals](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/batting-cage-scheduling-software-beyond-hourly-rentals)
- [Multi-Sport Facility Management Software: Technical Requirements](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/multi-sport-facility-management-software-technical-requirements-for-complex-operations)
- [How Many Software Subscriptions Are Draining Your Baseball Facility's Revenue?](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/how-many-software-subscriptions-are-draining-your-baseball-facility-s-revenue)
- [Mindbody for Sports Facilities: Does It Actually Work?](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/mindbody-for-sports-facilities-does-it-actually-work)
- [Transaction-Based Pricing vs Subscription Model for Facility Software](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog/sports-facility-management-software-transaction-based-pricing-vs-subscription-model)

## Features

- [Platform Overview](https://www.baselinepro.com/features): One connected system — marketing, memberships, scheduling, teams, athletes, reporting, and support.
- [Facility Management](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/facility): Scheduling, online booking, payments, AI automation, communication, payroll, and growth tools.
- [Sports Registration Software for Teams & Clubs](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/teams): AI team builder, registration forms, per-group invite links, payment plans, text-to-register, and payment recovery for youth teams and clubs.
- [Membership Management](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/memberships): Customizable memberships with credit cycles, family sharing, and access control.
- [Athlete Management](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/athletes): Athlete profiles, progress tracking, leaderboards, and family accounts.
- [Workout Programming](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/programming): Build workouts, assign programs, and run video assessments.
- [Marketing Tools](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/marketing): Local search tracking across Google Maps, Search and AI answers, Google Business Profile health checks, directory listings, Google review tracking, ad conversion tracking, lead forms, email, texting, and SEO.
- [Reporting & Accounting](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/reporting): Reconciled accounting, QuickBooks integration, payroll, and forecasting.
- [Website Builder](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/website-builder)
- [Keyless Entry](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/keyless-entry)
- [Support](https://www.baselinepro.com/features/support)

## Compare

- [Compare Sports Facility Software](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare): Verified comparison of 11 sports facility management platforms.
- [Baseline vs EZFacility](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/ezfacility)
- [Baseline vs Mindbody](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/mindbody)
- [Baseline vs Upper Hand](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/upper-hand)
- [Baseline vs TeamSnap](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/teamsnap)
- [Baseline vs SportsEngine](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/sportsengine)
- [Baseline vs LeagueApps](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/leagueapps)
- [Baseline vs Crossbar](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/crossbar)
- [Baseline vs eSoft Planner](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/esoft-planner)
- [Baseline vs Swift](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/swift)
- [Baseline vs Futures App](https://www.baselinepro.com/compare/futures-app)

## Industries

- [Baseball & Softball](https://www.baselinepro.com/industries/baseball)
- [Basketball](https://www.baselinepro.com/industries/basketball)
- [Soccer](https://www.baselinepro.com/industries/soccer)
- [Volleyball](https://www.baselinepro.com/industries/volleyball)
- [Multi-Sport Facilities](https://www.baselinepro.com/industries/multi-sport)

## Key Pages

- [Home](https://www.baselinepro.com/)
- [Blog](https://www.baselinepro.com/blog)
- [Customers](https://www.baselinepro.com/customers)
- [About](https://www.baselinepro.com/about)
- [Partners](https://www.baselinepro.com/partners)
- [Contact](https://www.baselinepro.com/contact)
- [Book a Demo](https://www.baselinepro.com/demo)
- [Free Marketing Consultation](https://www.baselinepro.com/marketing-consultation): A free 30-minute Google Meet call with Baseline's marketing team for sports facility owners and managers, on Baseline or not yet. It walks through where the facility is missing local searches on Google Maps, Google Search and Google's AI answers, who is winning them, and what it would take to win them back.
- [Help Center](https://www.baselinepro.com/help)
- [Security](https://www.baselinepro.com/security)
- [Privacy Policy](https://www.baselinepro.com/privacy)
- [Terms of Service](https://www.baselinepro.com/terms)